<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GaneshaFish.com &#187; bully</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/tag/bully/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ganeshafish.com</link>
	<description>Tech, Law, Movies, Music, Internet Culture and Humor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:28:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tactical IP&#8217;s Latest Bully Award Nominations</title>
		<link>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/10/20/tactical-ips-latest-bully-award-nominations/</link>
		<comments>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/10/20/tactical-ips-latest-bully-award-nominations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfischer1975</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bully]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympic committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex pistols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas instruments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tm bully]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ganeshafish.com/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a couple of weeks now, Tactical IP has been putting together a list of companies that deserve recognition for their *outstanding* intellectual property enforcement efforts.&#160; Below is their latest list of &#34;IP Bully of the Month&#34; nominees.&#160; You can check out all the recent entries here.&#160; Feel free to comment on who you think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding-bottom:4.5em; padding-top: 1.25em;"><a href="http://tacticalip.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://tacticalip.com/images/tiplogo2.jpg" alt="Tactical IP logo" class="alignleft" width="80" /></a><em>For a couple of weeks now, <a href="http://tacticalip.com" target="_blank">Tactical IP</a> has been putting together a list of companies that deserve recognition for their *outstanding* intellectual property enforcement efforts.&nbsp; Below is their latest list of &quot;IP Bully of the Month&quot; nominees.&nbsp; You can check out all the recent entries <a href="http://tacticalip.com/tag/bully/" target="_blank">here</a>.&nbsp; Feel free to comment on who you think deserves honors for the month.</em></div>
<hr />
<div style="padding-bottom:3em;"><a href="http://www.sexpistolsofficial.com/" target="_blank">The Sex Pistols</a> &#8212; for demanding that London-based <a href="http://www.theicecreamists.com/" target="_blank">Icecreamists</a> stop using its &quot;God Save the Cream&quot; advertising campaign for ice cream, which they allege is confusingly similar to the design of their &quot;God Save the Queen&quot; logo.&nbsp; Oddly enough, the pioneers of punk haven&#8217;t yet demanded that the Icecreamists stop selling its absinthe-flavored ice cream called &quot;The Sex Pistol.&quot;&nbsp; (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/14/sex-pistols-ice-cream" target="_blank">source</a>)<img src="http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Media/Pix/pictures/2009/10/14/1255521065659/Icecreamists-God-Save-the-001.jpg" alt="&quot;God Save the Cream&quot; logo" title="&quot;God Save the Cream&quot; logo" class="aligncenter" width="300" style="padding-top:5px;" /></div>
<div style="padding-bottom:3em;"><a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/about.html" target="_blank">Google Inc.</a> &#8212; for demanding that independent software developer, Steve Kondik a/k/a Cyanogen, stop distributing his free software, <a href="http://www.cyanogenmod.com/" target="_blank">CyanogenMOD</a>, that greatly expands the functionality of Google&#8217;s Android smartphone operating system.&nbsp; (<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/25/google_android_take_down_demand/" target="_blank">source</a>)<img src="http://www.thinkdigit.com/FCKeditor/uploads/cyanogenmod.jpg" alt="CyanogenMOD screenshot" title="CyanogenMOD screenshot" width="200" class="aligncenter" style="padding-top:5px;" /></div>
<p><span id="more-302"></span></p>
<div style="padding-bottom:3em;"><a href="http://www.teamusa.org/" target="_blank">The U.S. Olympic Committee</a> (USOC) &#8212; for successfully requiring Olympic Meat Packers, Inc. to change its name to Olympia Meat Packers, Inc. after nearly 40 years of use.&nbsp; Congratulations!&nbsp; (<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-olympics-name16-2009oct16,0,7170049.story?track=rss">source</a>)<img src="http://tacticalip.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/olympic-meat-300x225.jpg" alt="olympic-meat" title="olympic-meat" width="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-258" style="padding-top:5px;" /></div>
<div style="padding-bottom:3em;"><a href="http://www.ti.com/" target="_blank">Texas Instruments</a> (TI) &#8212; for sending cease-and-desist letters to TI-83 owners who hacked their calculators to run &quot;unapproved operating systems,&quot; which added new functionality to the devices.&nbsp; TI claims that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmca" target="_blank">Digital Millennium Copyright Act</a> (DMCA) justifies their demands.&nbsp; (<a href="http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/10/15/eff-defends-calculator-hackers-accused-by-texas-instruments" target="_blank">source</a>)<img src="http://www.chadcargill.com/assets/images/TI-83Plus.jpg" alt="TI-83 Plus" title="TI-83 Plus" width="150" class="aligncenter" style="padding-top:5px;" /></div>
<div style="padding-bottom:3em;"><a href="http://www.olympic.org/" target="_blank">The International Olympic Committee</a> (IOC) &#8212; for sending a cease-and-desist letter to amateur photographer, Richard Giles, after finding roughly 300 pictures on Flickr, which were taken by Mr. Giles during his trip to the 2008 Beijing Games.&nbsp; (<a href="http://www.thestar.com/olympics/article/707868--remove-china-photos-from-website-olympics-warns" target="_blank">source</a>)<img src="http://media.thestar.topscms.com/images/67/85/59585f564de583adb2cec3364475.jpeg" alt="Richard Giles in Beijing" title="Richard Giles in Beijing" width="300" class="aligncenter" style="padding-top:5px;" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/10/20/tactical-ips-latest-bully-award-nominations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And our &#8220;IP Bully of the Week&#8221; Award goes to&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/10/07/and-our-ip-bully-of-the-week-award-goes-to/</link>
		<comments>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/10/07/and-our-ip-bully-of-the-week-award-goes-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfischer1975</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bully]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ralph lauren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zwsmlaw.com/tacticalip/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ralph Lauren &#8212; for sending DMCA take-down letters in an attempt to suppress some negative blog commentary about the photo below, e.g., comments like &#8220;Dude, her head&#8217;s bigger than her pelvis&#8221; (source).</p>
<p></p>
<p>You can read about what happened here and here.</p>
<p>UPDATE:&#160; Ralph Lauren has issued a statement, apologizing for the poor photoshop job.&#160; We&#8217;re still waiting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ralphlauren.com" target="_blank">Ralph Lauren</a> &#8212; for sending DMCA take-down letters in an attempt to suppress some negative blog commentary about the photo below, e.g., comments like &#8220;Dude, her head&#8217;s bigger than her pelvis&#8221; (<a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/09/29/ralph-lauren-opens-n.html" target="_blank">source</a>).</p>
<p><img alt="Ralph Lauren Photoshop Disaster" src="http://ganeshafish.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/ralph-lauren-photoshop-disaster.jpg" title="Ralph Lauren Photoshop Disaster" class="aligncenter" width="257" height="449" /></p>
<p>You can read about what happened <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://randazza.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/unethical-or-just-plain-stupid-a-thin-dmca-letter/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>UPDATE:&nbsp; Ralph Lauren has <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20091012/0322546488.shtml" target="_blank">issued a statement</a>, apologizing for the poor photoshop job.&nbsp; We&#8217;re still waiting for an apology about their DMCA abuses.</p>
<hr />
<p><em>This story was originally published on <a href="http://tacticalip.com/2009/10/07/and-our-ip-bully-of-the-week-award-goes-to/" target="_blank">The Tactical IP Blog</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/10/07/and-our-ip-bully-of-the-week-award-goes-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The North Face claims that consumers don&#039;t know their heads from their asses</title>
		<link>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/10/03/the-north-face-claims-that-consumers-dont-know-their-heads-from-their-asses/</link>
		<comments>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/10/03/the-north-face-claims-that-consumers-dont-know-their-heads-from-their-asses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfischer1975</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bully]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[likelihood of confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north face]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tm bully]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zwsmlaw.com/tacticalip/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Clothing producer, The North Face (TNF), recently got a lesson in how bad trademark enforcement decisions can make a company look silly.&#160; It seems a St. Louis teen thought that it would be amusing to create a clothing line parody, calling it &#8220;The South Butt,&#8221; &#8212; south being the logical opposite of north and butt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cdn.thenorthface.com/wcsstore/ConsumerDirectStorefrontAssetStore/images/en_US/global/theNorthFaceLogo.png" alt="The North Face logo" class="alignleft" />Clothing producer, <a href="http://www.thenorthface.com" target="_blank">The North Face</a> (TNF), recently got a lesson in how bad trademark enforcement decisions can make a company look silly.&nbsp; It seems a St. Louis teen thought that it would be amusing to create a clothing line parody, calling it &#8220;<a href="http://shop.thesouthbutt.com" target="_blank">The South Butt</a>,&#8221; &#8212; south being the logical opposite of north and butt being&#8230; well&#8230; you get the idea.&nbsp; TNF was not amused, however, and they set their attorneys to attack mode, sending a cease and desist letter to the college freshman (<a href="http://www.kplr11.com/news/kplr-north-face-south-butt-story-092809,0,5432810.story" target="_blank">source</a>).</p>
<p>TNF&#8217;s letter asserted that use of the &#8220;South Butt&#8221; logo (pictured below) constitutes an infringement of their own federally registered trademark (pictured above).&nbsp; On its face, TNF&#8217;s claim is not so unreasonable.&nbsp; As any trademark owner (who has a decent attorney) can tell you, trademark rights can be lost if you don&#8217;t enforce them.&nbsp; TNF must, in order to maintain its ability to sue legitimate infringers, actively look for unauthorized uses of its logo.&nbsp; However, owning federal trademark rights does not mean you can stop every use of your mark that you don&#8217;t like.&nbsp; Federal trademark law was created to prevent consumers from becoming confused about the source of goods, not give complete exclusionary rights in logos, words, and phrases.&nbsp; It certainly wasn&#8217;t meant to give companies the power to stifle criticism &#8212; a point that corporate attorneys seem to frequently fail to explain to their clients.</p>
<p><span id="more-20"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://tacticalip.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/south-butt-300x76.jpg" alt="The South Butt logo" width="200" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-275" />In order to be actionable as an infringement, the South Butt logo must be likely to cause confusion in the minds of the consuming public.&nbsp; In other words, if &#8220;a moron in a hurry&#8221; would not be able to tell the difference between these two logos, then TNF could conceivably stop South Butt from using their logo.&nbsp; I think South Butt&#8217;s attorney states the issue with TNF&#8217;s claim pretty well:</p>
<blockquote><p>I did try to explain with a great deal of candor to counsel for the North Face that the general public is aware of the difference between a face and a butt.&nbsp; (<a href="http://www.kplr11.com/news/kplr-north-face-south-butt-story-092809,0,5432810.story" target="_blank">source</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>The irony is that, as many other companies have learned in the past, over enforcing your trademark rights can have the exact opposite effect from the one that you intended.&nbsp; In this case, only a few people were even aware of the &#8220;South Butt&#8221; brand before TNF took any action.&nbsp; Presumably, TNF wanted to suppress this innocent gibe at their popular brand, but instead, they only managed to boost web traffic at <a href="http://shop.thesouthbutt.com" target="_blank">shop.thesouthbutt.com</a>.</p>
<hr />
<p><em>This story was originally published on <a href="http://tacticalip.com/2009/10/03/the-north-face-claims-that-consumers-dont-know-their-heads-from-their-asses/" target="_blank">The Tactical IP Blog</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/10/03/the-north-face-claims-that-consumers-dont-know-their-heads-from-their-asses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confusion?&#8230; We don&#8217;t need no stinkin&#8217; confusion!</title>
		<link>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/04/07/confusion-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-confusion/</link>
		<comments>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/04/07/confusion-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-confusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfischer1975</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bully]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tm bully]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ganeshafish.com/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The Wall Street Journal published a story about how Monster Cable was trying to bully the owners of a mom-and-pop business into changing their name.  According to David Tognotti, Monster Cable&#8217;s general manager and an attorney, the company considers &#8220;Monster&#8221; a famous mark &#8212; on a par with Barbie dolls or Camel cigarettes, giving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="monster" src="http://ganeshafish.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/monster.jpg" title="Monster Cable" class="alignright" width="250" /></p>
<p>The Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123869022704882969.html">published a story</a> about how <a href="http://www.monstercable.com">Monster Cable</a> was trying to bully the owners of a mom-and-pop business into changing their name.  According to David Tognotti, Monster Cable&#8217;s general manager and an attorney, the company considers &#8220;Monster&#8221; a famous mark &#8212; on a par with <a href="http://barbie.everythinggirl.com/">Barbie dolls</a> or <a href="http://www.camel.com">Camel cigarettes</a>, giving them the right to prevent an indoor mini golf establishment from calling itself &#8220;Monster Mini Golf.&#8221;  (I guess Mr. Tognotti&#8217;s IP professor didn&#8217;t fill him in on how much success Mattel has had keeping people from using its &#8220;Barbie&#8221; trademark.  See <a href="http://tinyurl.com/22vd8u">here</a> and <a href="http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/08/30/wrong-barbie-mattel-lives-up-to-its-dolls-airhead-image">here</a>.)  He even cites to &#8220;McCarthy on Trademarks&#8221; as his authority.  However, WSJ interviewed Professor McCarthy, who pointed out that federal courts get to decide which marks are famous, not general managers of stereo cable manufacturers.</p>
<p>Other ridiculous enforcement efforts, pursued by Monster Cable:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster_Garage">Monster Garage</a> (a show on the <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com">Discovery Channel</a> about modding cars and trucks)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.monsterenergy.com">Monster Energy Drink</a></li>
<li>Monster HTPC (a maker of high-end gaming PCs)</li>
<li>Snow Monsters (a kid’s skiing group)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.monstervintage.com">MonsterVintage.com</a> (a small used clothing store)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0198781">Monsters, Inc.</a> (an animated feature film, produced by <a href="http://www.pixar.com">Pixar</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsters_of_the_Midway">Monsters of the Midway</a> (a nickname of the <a href="http://www.chicagobears.com/index.html">Chicago Bears</a> football team)</li>
<li>Green Monster seats (taking their name from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Monster">the left field wall</a> at <a href="http://boston.redsox.mlb.com">Fenway Park</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.monster.com">Monster.com</a> (an employment website)</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<p><em>This story was originally published on <a href="http://randazza.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/confusion-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-confusion/" target="_blank">The Legal Satyricon</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ganeshafish.com/index.php/2009/04/07/confusion-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

